2 June 2026 · 7 min read · Neutron Systems

The UK's transition to electric fleets is exposing a fundamental infrastructure constraint. Traditional single-unit DC chargers — designed for forecourt deployment — cannot scale to the density and power demands of modern fleet depots. A 50-bay bus garage drawing simultaneous multi-megawatt demand needs a different architectural approach entirely.

The answer lies in separating the two functions that every charging system must perform: power conversion (AC to DC) and power delivery (getting that DC to the vehicle). Bundling both into every charger made sense for single installations. At depot scale, it creates compounding cost and complexity.

The core insight: a fleet depot is not fifty individual charging events happening simultaneously — it is one large power management problem, with vehicles as the loads. The architecture should reflect that.

Why Single-Unit Chargers Don't Scale

Each traditional integrated DC charger bundles a power module, distribution switchgear, display, and communications into one cabinet. For a single vehicle, this is efficient. For a 50-bay depot, the problems compound:

Centralised power architecture diagram showing Master Unit distributing power to multiple Terminal Units across a fleet depot

Centralised power architecture: one Master Unit manages conversion and distribution; lightweight Terminal Units handle vehicle connections at each bay.

The Group Charging Paradigm

Neutron's Master-Terminal architecture — pioneering what the industry now calls group charging — separates power conversion from power delivery at the hardware level. A single Master Unit handles all AC-to-DC conversion and power distribution management. Lightweight Terminal Units, distributed across the depot, provide the physical connection point at each bay.

Terminals have no high-voltage electronics of their own. They carry less than 36V DC on their external surfaces — eliminating the live-current exposure risk present in every integrated charger. A technician can work on a terminal bay without isolating the entire system.

The topology scales cleanly:

Master Unit Terminals Peak Capacity Bay Coverage
240 kW 2–3 240 kW 2–3 bays
480 kW 4–6 480 kW 4–6 bays
960 kW (×2 masters) 8–12 960 kW 8–12 bays
4 MW (11kV MV direct) 20+ 4,000 kW 20+ bays

Dynamic power pooling means the total installed capacity serves all connected vehicles simultaneously — but allocates current based on real-time state of charge. A vehicle at 90% SOC receives minimum current; one at 20% SOC receives maximum. The system dispatches intelligently, without operator input, 24 hours a day.

Engineering Advantages: Excavation and Civil Works

The civil engineering savings are where group charging architecture delivers its most immediate ROI. Where conventional depot build requires one cable run per bay, Master-Terminal consolidates:

Validated engineering metrics vs single-unit deployment
30%
Footprint reduction vs equivalent single-unit installation
7–10
Days to go live (vs 4–8 weeks conventional)
20%
Higher equipment utilisation through dynamic power pooling
90%
Lower fault rate — full-encapsulation maintenance-free modules

The PDU (Power Distribution Unit) switching architecture underpins these reliability gains. Unlike matrix or relay-based designs, PDU topology presents the lowest DC arc risk, highest system stability, and simplest maintenance profile — critical in depot environments where uptime is an operational requirement, not a nice-to-have.

Neutron 480kW Master Unit — central power conversion hub for Master-Terminal group charging deployments

The Neutron 480kW Master Unit: AC input, 50–1000V DC output, managing up to 6 terminal bays with dynamic load balancing and OCPP 1.6J integration.

2025: The 4MW Threshold

In 2025, Neutron extended the Master-Terminal concept to its logical limit. An 11kV medium-voltage, 4MW integrated full-matrix ultra-charger — not an incremental upgrade but a new category — reached commercial deployment.

Six new products launched in 2025, filling gaps that no manufacturer had previously addressed:

100MW-class megacharger Digital maintenance-free modules VPP zero-carbon campus architecture 11kV MV 4MW full-matrix ultra-charger Intelligent group dispatch platform Liquid-cooled megawatt terminal

The 4MW system connects directly at 11kV medium voltage — bypassing LV distribution entirely and eliminating the transformer losses and capacity constraints that limit conventional depot installations.

Specification Value
Grid connection11kV medium voltage direct
Total system output4,000 kW
Single-gun maximum2,000 kW
Dual-gun maximum4,000 kW
Voltage range200–1,500V DC
Compatible connectorMCS (Megawatt Charging System), CCS2, CHAdeMO
Charge time — 400kWh heavy truck~10 minutes

Oil-Electric Parity for Heavy Fleets

The 10-minute charge time for a 400kWh new energy heavy truck is the benchmark the logistics and haulage industry has been waiting for. A commercial diesel fuel stop — pump, pay, go — takes 8–12 minutes. The 4MW system matches that exactly.

This is what oil-electric parity looks like in practice: not just energy equivalence, but matching diesel refuelling speed. A driver doesn't change their behaviour. A depot operator doesn't rebuild their shift pattern. The charging infrastructure adapts to the fleet, not the other way around.

For heavy truck operators, the combined case is compelling:

Grid Integration: From Load to Asset

The 2025 architecture goes beyond vehicle charging. With VPP (Virtual Power Plant) integration built into the group dispatch platform, a fleet depot becomes a dispatchable grid asset.

During periods of peak grid demand, parked and fully-charged vehicles can export energy back to the network — with the Master-Terminal system managing bi-directional flow automatically within OCPP and OCPI frameworks. A 100-vehicle bus depot with 60% fleet availability at any given time holds approximately 12,000–18,000kWh of stored energy: equivalent to a medium-scale grid battery, available on 15-minute notice.

Under the UK's flexible export tariffs and Demand Flexibility Service, this stored capacity can generate revenue that partially offsets charging infrastructure operating costs — converting a pure cost centre into a partial revenue stream.

Zero-carbon campus architecture extends this further: solar PV, battery storage, EV fleet, and building loads managed as a single optimised system, with the group charging platform as the intelligent hub.

Phased Deployment Path

No depot needs to commit to 4MW from day one. The Master-Terminal architecture supports a phased build-out in which each investment is additive rather than replacement:

1

Phase 1 — Pilot cluster: 240 kW

One 240kW Master + 3 terminals. 3 bays active. Validates grid connection, civil works, and driver workflow. Can be live in 7–10 days from grid approval.

2

Phase 2 — Expanded fleet: 960 kW

Add second 480kW Master + 3 terminals. 6–8 bays active. Existing Phase 1 terminals connect without modification.

3

Phase 3 — Full depot: 1.92 MW

Four 480kW Masters, 20–24 terminals. Full bus or logistics fleet coverage with dynamic load balancing across the site.

4

Phase 4 — Heavy fleet / MV direct: 4 MW

11kV medium-voltage connection, liquid-cooled megawatt terminals. Heavy trucks, coaches, and high-demand applications. Oil-electric parity achieved.

Each phase is backwards compatible. Existing terminals connect to upgraded Masters without replacement. The civil works done in Phase 1 support the full Phase 4 system.

Design Your Depot Architecture

Neutron provides free depot assessments covering DNO capacity analysis, parking layout, load modelling, and phased investment planning — with no obligation to proceed.

Request a Free Assessment